Plant Trait List
This list was determined at the Minnesota LTER Ecophylogenetics meeting in May 2007. It is meant to prioritize the most important and easiest traits to measure. The collection of plant trait data and their compilation into large databases has grown in recent years. The traits collected are used for various endeavors including developing functional groupings of plants, linking individual species function to ecosystem processes, understanding fundamental trade-offs in plant function/plant strategies and exploring the interaction of species traits, phylogenetic history and community assembly. Below is a broad list of traits of interest. Shown in bold, the first four traits are those of highest priority for our initial cross-site comparisons (first three only for non-woody plants). The rest of the list is organized roughly by the categories of whole plant traits, leaf, stem and root traits and regenerative traits. We realize that this is a wish list and welcome input on other traits participants in this workshop deem of interest. Superscripts denote related references.
|
TRAIT |
PREFFERED UNIT |
DESCRIPTION |
|
Relatively easily measured (“soft” traits) |
||
|
Seed mass |
mg |
Oven dry mass of an average seed1,2 |
|
Specific leaf area (SLA) |
m2 kg-1 |
One sided leaf area of fresh leaf divided by its dry mass 1,2,3 |
|
Plant height |
m |
Height of highest leaf tissue1,2 |
|
Wood density |
kg m-3 |
Dry weight of wood sample divided by fresh volume of the same sample4,5 |
|
Growth form |
categorical |
Based on canopy structure and height (e.g. tree, shrub, tussock, short basal)2 |
|
Life form |
categorical |
Raunkiear classification based on perennating tissue2 |
|
Clonality |
categorical |
Ability to reproduce vegetatively2 |
|
Spinescence |
categorical |
Degree of spines, thorns or prickles2 |
|
Flammability |
compound, unitless |
Ease of ignition of a species2 |
|
Leaf size |
mm2 |
One sided projected leaf area2 |
|
Leaf dry matter content |
mg g-1 |
Oven-dry mass divided by water-saturated fresh mass2 |
|
Leaf nitrogen concentration |
mg g-1 |
Total amount of N per unit dry leaf mass2,3 |
|
Leaf phosphorus concentration |
mg g-1 |
Total amount of P per unit dry leaf mass2,3 |
|
Physical strength of leaves |
N or N mm-1 |
Resistance to fracture, force to cut at a constant angle or tensile strength, the force needed to tear a leaf2 |
|
Leaf lifespan |
months |
Time that a leaf (or analog) is alive and physiologically active2, 3 |
|
Leaf phenology |
months/year |
Number of months per year that the leaf canopy is green2 |
|
|
|
|
|
TRAIT |
PREFFERED UNIT | DESCRIPTION |
|
Photosynthetic pathway |
categorical |
C3, C4 or CAM2 |
|
Leaf frost sensitivity |
% electrolyte leakage |
Sensitivity to freezing2 |
|
Leaf perimeter/area ratio |
cm cm-2 |
Length of leaf perimeter divided by fresh leaf area6,7 |
|
Stem specific density |
mg mm-3 |
Oven-dry mass of main stem divided by fresh volume of same stem2 |
|
Twig dry matter content |
mg g-1 |
Oven-dry mass of terminal twig divided by fresh volume of same twig2 |
|
Bark thickness (& quality) |
mm |
Thickness of stem external to the xylem/wood2 |
|
Specific root length |
m g-1 |
Ratio of root length to mass; belowground analogue of SLA2 |
|
Root depth distribution |
g m-3 |
How is the root biomass distributed vertically in the soil2 |
|
95% rooting depth |
m |
Estimate of depth above which 95% of the root biomass is located2 |
|
Nutrient uptake strategy |
categorical |
Mechanisms to take up nutrients (e.g. N fixer, mycorhizzae, carnivorous)2 |
|
Dispersal mode |
categorical |
e.g. wind, ant, endo-zoochory2 |
|
Dispersule shape |
unitless |
Variance of three dimensions (length, width, thickness)2 |
|
Dispersule size |
mg |
Oven dry mass of entire reproductive dispersule2 |
|
Resprouting capacity after major disturbance |
categorical |
Capacity to resprout after desctruction of most of its aboveground biomass2 |
|
Cotyledon type |
categorical |
e.g. epigeal, hypogeal8 |
|
Short list of more difficult to measure (“hard” traits) |
||
|
Potential relative growth rate |
g g-1 d-1 |
rate of growth as a function of existing mass |
|
Photosynthetic capacity/respiration rate |
μmol CO2 g-1 s-1 |
maximum rate of photosynthesis per unit mass and dark respiration rate per unit mass3 |
|
Leaf hydraulic conductance |
kg m-2 s-1 MPa-1 |
hydraulic conductance of the leaf lamina6 |
|
Stomatal pore index |
dimensionless |
stomatal density multiplied by aperture length squared6 |
|
Stem hydraulic conductance |
kg m-2 s-1 MPa-1 |
Hydraulic conductance of stem tissue9 |
|
Plant biomass |
g |
Oven-dry weight of entire plant |
|
Seed persistence |
categorical or mo |
length of time a seed remains viable |
References
1. Westoby, M. 1998. A leaf-height-seed (LHS) plant ecology strategy scheme. Plant and Soil 199:213-227.
2a. Cornelissen, J. H. C., S. Lavorel, E. Garnier, S. Diaz, N. Buchmann, D. E. Gurvich, P. B. Reich, H. ter Steege, H. D. Morgan, M. G. A. van der Heijden, J. G. Pausas, and H. Poorter. 2003. A handbook of protocols for standardised and easy measurement of plant functional traits worldwide. Australian Journal of Botany 51:335-380.
2b. Diaz S, M Cabido, F Casanoves. 1999 Plant functional traits and environmental filters at a regional scale. Journal of Vegetation Science 9:113-122
2c. Weiher E, A. van der Werf , K Thompson, M Roderick, E Garnier, O Eriksson. 1999. Challenging Theophrastus: a common core list of plant traits for functional ecology. Journal of Vegetation Science 10:609-620
3. Wright, I. J., P. B. Reich, M. Westoby, D. D. Ackerly, Z. Baruch, F. Bongers, J. Cavender-Bares, T. Chapin, J. H. C. Cornelissen, M. Diemer, J. Flexas, E. Garnier, P. K. Groom, J. Gulias, K. Hikosaka, B. B. Lamont, T. Lee, W. Lee, C. Lusk, J. J. Midgley, M. L. Navas, U. Niinemets, J. Oleksyn, N. Osada, H. Poorter, P. Poot, L. Prior, V. I. Pyankov, C. Roumet, S. C. Thomas, M. G. Tjoelker, E. J. Veneklaas, and R. Villar. 2004. The worldwide leaf economics spectrum. Nature 428:821-827.
4. Meinzer, F. C. 2003. Functional convergence in plant responses to the environment. Oecologia 134:1 - 11.
5. Cornwell, W. K., D. Schwilk, and D. Ackerly. 2006. A trait-based test for habitat filtering: hull volume. Ecology 87:1465-1471.
6. Sack, L., P. D. Cowan, N. Jaikumar, and N. M. Holbrook. 2003. The 'hydrology' of leaves: co-ordination of structure and function in temperate woody species. Plant Cell and Environment 26:1343-1356.
7. Cavender-Bares, J., A. Keen, and B. Miles. 2006. Phylogenetic structure of Floridian plant communities depends on taxonomic and spatial scale. Ecology 87:S109-S122
8. Kitajima, K., and M. Fenner. 2000. Ecology of seedling regeneration. Pages 331-360 in M. Fenner, editor. Seeds: the ecology of regeneration in plant communities. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.
9a. Cavender-Bares, J., K. Kitajima, and F. A. Bazzaz. 2004. Multiple trait associations in relation to habitat differentiation among 17 Florida oak species. Ecological Monographs 74:635-662.
9b. Cavender-Bares, J., D. D. Ackerly, D. A. Baum, and F. A. Bazzaz. 2004. Phylogenetic overdispersion in Floridian oak communities. American Naturalist 163:823-843.