Personal tools
You are here: Home Data Trait Data Plant Trait List
Document Actions

Plant Trait List

by Jeannine Cavender-Bares last modified 2009-08-12 16:15

This list was determined at the Minnesota LTER Ecophylogenetics meeting in May 2007. It is meant to prioritize the most important and easiest traits to measure. The collection of plant trait data and their compilation into large databases has grown in recent years. The traits collected are used for various endeavors including developing functional groupings of plants, linking individual species function to ecosystem processes, understanding fundamental trade-offs in plant function/plant strategies and exploring the interaction of species traits, phylogenetic history and community assembly. Below is a broad list of traits of interest. Shown in bold, the first four traits are those of highest priority for our initial cross-site comparisons (first three only for non-woody plants). The rest of the list is organized roughly by the categories of whole plant traits, leaf, stem and root traits and regenerative traits. We realize that this is a wish list and welcome input on other traits participants in this workshop deem of interest. Superscripts denote related references.

TRAIT

PREFFERED UNIT

DESCRIPTION

Relatively easily measured (“soft” traits)

Seed mass

mg

Oven dry mass of an average seed1,2

Specific leaf area (SLA)

m2 kg-1

One sided leaf area of fresh leaf divided by its dry mass 1,2,3

Plant height

m

Height of highest leaf tissue1,2

Wood density

kg m-3

Dry weight of wood sample divided by fresh volume of the same sample4,5

Growth form

categorical

Based on canopy structure and height (e.g. tree, shrub, tussock, short basal)2

Life form

categorical

Raunkiear classification based on perennating tissue2

Clonality

categorical

Ability to reproduce vegetatively2

Spinescence

categorical

Degree of spines, thorns or prickles2

Flammability

compound, unitless

Ease of ignition of a species2

Leaf size

mm2

One sided projected leaf area2

Leaf dry matter content

mg g-1

Oven-dry mass divided by water-saturated fresh mass2

Leaf nitrogen concentration

mg g-1

Total amount of N per unit dry leaf mass2,3

Leaf phosphorus concentration

mg g-1

Total amount of P per unit dry leaf mass2,3

Physical strength of leaves

N or N mm-1

Resistance to fracture, force to cut at a constant angle or tensile strength, the force needed to tear a leaf2

Leaf lifespan

months

Time that a leaf (or analog) is alive and physiologically active2, 3

Leaf phenology

months/year

Number of months per year that the leaf canopy is green2




TRAIT

 PREFFERED UNIT  DESCRIPTION

Photosynthetic pathway

categorical

C3, C4 or CAM2

Leaf frost sensitivity

% electrolyte leakage

Sensitivity to freezing2

Leaf perimeter/area ratio

cm cm-2

Length of leaf perimeter divided by fresh leaf area6,7

Stem specific density

mg mm-3

Oven-dry mass of main stem divided by fresh volume of same stem2

Twig dry matter content

mg g-1

Oven-dry mass of terminal twig divided by fresh volume of same twig2

Bark thickness (& quality)

mm

Thickness of stem external to the xylem/wood2

Specific root length

m g-1

Ratio of root length to mass; belowground analogue of SLA2

Root depth distribution

g m-3

How is the root biomass distributed vertically in the soil2

95% rooting depth

m

Estimate of depth above which 95% of the root biomass is located2

Nutrient uptake strategy

categorical

Mechanisms to take up nutrients (e.g. N fixer, mycorhizzae, carnivorous)2

Dispersal mode

categorical

e.g. wind, ant, endo-zoochory2

Dispersule shape

unitless

Variance of three dimensions (length, width, thickness)2

Dispersule size

mg

Oven dry mass of entire reproductive dispersule2

Resprouting capacity after major disturbance

categorical

Capacity to resprout after desctruction of most of its aboveground biomass2

Cotyledon type

categorical

e.g. epigeal, hypogeal8

Short list of  more difficult to measure (“hard” traits)

Potential relative growth rate

g g-1 d-1

rate of growth as a function of existing mass

Photosynthetic capacity/respiration rate

μmol CO2 g-1 s-1

maximum rate of photosynthesis per unit mass and dark respiration rate per unit mass3

Leaf hydraulic conductance

kg m-2 s-1 MPa-1

hydraulic conductance of the leaf lamina6

Stomatal pore index

dimensionless

stomatal density multiplied by aperture length squared6

Stem hydraulic conductance

kg m-2 s-1 MPa-1

Hydraulic conductance of stem tissue9

Plant biomass

g

Oven-dry weight of entire plant

Seed persistence

categorical or mo

length of time a seed remains viable


References

1. Westoby, M. 1998. A leaf-height-seed (LHS) plant ecology strategy scheme. Plant and Soil 199:213-227.

2a. Cornelissen, J. H. C., S. Lavorel, E. Garnier, S. Diaz, N. Buchmann, D. E. Gurvich, P. B. Reich, H. ter Steege, H. D. Morgan, M. G. A. van der Heijden, J. G. Pausas, and H. Poorter. 2003. A handbook of protocols for standardised and easy measurement of plant functional traits worldwide. Australian Journal of Botany 51:335-380.

2b. Diaz S, M Cabido, F Casanoves. 1999 Plant functional traits and environmental filters at a regional scale. Journal of Vegetation Science 9:113-122

2c. Weiher E, A. van der Werf , K Thompson, M Roderick, E Garnier, O Eriksson. 1999. Challenging Theophrastus:  a common core list of plant traits for functional ecology. Journal of Vegetation Science 10:609-620

3. Wright, I. J., P. B. Reich, M. Westoby, D. D. Ackerly, Z. Baruch, F. Bongers, J. Cavender-Bares, T. Chapin, J. H. C. Cornelissen, M. Diemer, J. Flexas, E. Garnier, P. K. Groom, J. Gulias, K. Hikosaka, B. B. Lamont, T. Lee, W. Lee, C. Lusk, J. J. Midgley, M. L. Navas, U. Niinemets, J. Oleksyn, N. Osada, H. Poorter, P. Poot, L. Prior, V. I. Pyankov, C. Roumet, S. C. Thomas, M. G. Tjoelker, E. J. Veneklaas, and R. Villar. 2004. The worldwide leaf economics spectrum. Nature 428:821-827.

4. Meinzer, F. C. 2003. Functional convergence in plant responses to the environment. Oecologia 134:1 - 11.

5. Cornwell, W. K., D. Schwilk, and D. Ackerly. 2006. A trait-based test for habitat filtering: hull volume. Ecology 87:1465-1471.

6. Sack, L., P. D. Cowan, N. Jaikumar, and N. M. Holbrook. 2003. The 'hydrology' of leaves: co-ordination of structure and function in temperate woody species. Plant Cell and Environment 26:1343-1356.

7. Cavender-Bares, J., A. Keen, and B. Miles. 2006. Phylogenetic structure of Floridian plant communities depends on taxonomic and spatial scale. Ecology 87:S109-S122

8. Kitajima, K., and M. Fenner. 2000. Ecology of seedling regeneration. Pages 331-360 in M. Fenner, editor. Seeds: the ecology of regeneration in plant communities. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.

9a. Cavender-Bares, J., K. Kitajima, and F. A. Bazzaz. 2004. Multiple trait associations in relation to habitat differentiation among 17 Florida oak species. Ecological Monographs 74:635-662.

9b. Cavender-Bares, J., D. D. Ackerly, D. A. Baum, and F. A. Bazzaz. 2004. Phylogenetic overdispersion in Floridian oak communities. American Naturalist 163:823-843.

 

Powered by Plone CMS, the Open Source Content Management System